Monday, May 5, 2008

I am a sixty-three-year old breast cancer survivor, It has been more than six years since my episode with the disease. Last fall, I had follow-up scan and was informed that the cancer had metastasized to my lung. As a result, I would need additional tests and biopsies. Naturally, I was in shock from the news. After two months of multiple CT scans and painful procedures, doctors reported that the “nodule” had disappeared and concluded that the condition was simply an infection.

Today, me and my husband are trying to recover emotionally and financially, since many of the unnecessary tests were not reimbursed by my health plan -- it's a damned if you do, damned if you don't catch 22.

Where does the fault lie in all this? If my initital study had been read by a lung diagnostic specialist, instead of the general radiologist who looked at it, I think there would have been an increased likelihood of an accurate diagnosis the first time. We just assume that diagnostic results are definitive -- but it is really a question of interpretation, skill and experience.

http://www.yourmisdiagnosis.com/

No comments: